p:runs =1..
p: lost >1
dog of less = 150..
1st game of double header..
2005..
5-14 run line (-155) so..
14-5 run line (+141) avg fading..
http://killersports.com/mlb/query?su...+S+D+Q+L+%21++
fade sf
was -1.5 +136 (game 1)
have a 32-0 (-241 avg) lad trend dating to 2004..it's 28-4 rl (-112 avg)
lad -1.5 (-125)
p: team scored 5 runs in 2 innings and that's it..
since 7/10/2010
0-5 (-131) avg odds (-3.00) margin
small sample but find interesting teams laying an avg of 131 lose by an avg of 3 runs/gm
http://killersports.com/mlb/query?su...+S+D+Q+L+%21++
fade bos
nyy +142
have 1-8 o/u
2004
6 straight unders with sizeable margins..
has to do with 2nd game of a dh..
was/sf under 8 (game 2)**
** ouch !!
p: lost >1
dog of less = 150..
1st game of double header..
2005..
5-14 run line (-155) so..
14-5 run line (+141) avg fading..
http://killersports.com/mlb/query?su...+S+D+Q+L+%21++
fade sf
was -1.5 +136 (game 1)
have a 32-0 (-241 avg) lad trend dating to 2004..it's 28-4 rl (-112 avg)
lad -1.5 (-125)
p: team scored 5 runs in 2 innings and that's it..
since 7/10/2010
0-5 (-131) avg odds (-3.00) margin
small sample but find interesting teams laying an avg of 131 lose by an avg of 3 runs/gm
http://killersports.com/mlb/query?su...+S+D+Q+L+%21++
fade bos
nyy +142
have 1-8 o/u
2004
6 straight unders with sizeable margins..
has to do with 2nd game of a dh..
was/sf under 8 (game 2)**
** ouch !!
Comment